| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
Leviticus
Chapter One
New King James Version (NKJV)
INTRODUCTION TO LEVITICUS 1 This chapter contains
certain laws and rules concerning sacrifices, particularly burnt offerings,
which were delivered by the Lord to Moses, Leviticus 1:1 what
those offerings should be of, Leviticus 1:3 what
rules should be observed, what actions should be done, first by the persons
that brought them, Leviticus 1:3 and
then by the priest that offered them, with respect to the burnt offering of the
herd, Leviticus 1:5 and
to the burnt offering of the sheep and goats, Leviticus 1:11 and
to the burnt offering of fowls, Leviticus 1:15 all
which, when offered aright, were of a sweet savour to the Lord, Leviticus 1:9.
Leviticus 1:1. Now
the Lord
called to Moses, and spoke to him from the tabernacle of meeting, saying,
YLT 1And Jehovah calleth unto Moses, and speaketh
unto him out of the tent of meeting, saying,
And the Lord called unto Moses,.... Or "met
him", as the phrase is rendered in Numbers 23:4. The
word ויקרא, translated "called", the last
letter of it is written in a very small character, to show, as the JewsF2Vid.
Buxtorf. Tiberias, c. 15. p. 39. say, that he met him accidentally, and
unawares to Moses: other mysteries they observe in it, as that it respects the
modesty of Moses, who lessened himself, and got out of the way, that he might
not have the government laid upon him, and therefore the Lord called him; or to
denote the wonderful condescension of the Lord, whose throne is in heaven, and
yet vouchsafed to dwell in the tabernacle, out of which he called to Moses, and
from Mount Sinai, and out of the cloudF3R. Abraham Seba, Tzeror
Hammor, fol. 92. 1. 2. . The word "Lord" is not in this clause, but
the following, from whence it is supplied by our translators, as it is in the
Syriac version, and as the word "God" is in the Arabic version; the
two Targums of Jonathan and Jerusalem paraphrase it,"the Word of the Lord
called to Moses,'by an articulate voice, though it may be it was a still small
one; and which some think is the reason of the smallness of the letter before
mentioned; and Aben Ezra says that Moses heard it, but all Israel did not hear:
and spoke unto him out of the tabernacle of the congregation; from off the
mercy seat, between the cherubim over the ark, where the glory of the Lord, or
the divine Shechinah and Majesty took up its residence, and from whence the
Lord promised to commune with Moses, Exodus 25:22,
saying; what follows concerning sacrifices; which shows, that these were
not human inventions, but of divine institution, and by the appointment of God.
Leviticus 1:2.
2 “Speak to the children of
Israel, and say to them: ‘When any one of you brings an offering to the Lord, you shall
bring your offering of the livestock—of the herd and of the flock.
YLT 2`Speak unto the sons of Israel, and thou hast
said unto them, Any man of you when he doth bring near an offering to Jehovah,
out of the cattle -- out of the herd, or out of the flock -- ye do bring near
your offering.
Speak unto the children of Israel, and say unto them,.... For unto
no other was the law of sacrifices given; not to the Gentiles, but to the
children of Israel:
if any man; or woman, for the word "man", as Ben Gersom observes,
includes the whole species:
of you; of you Israelites; the Targum of Jonathan adds,"and not of
the apostates who worship idols.'Jarchi interprets it of yours, of your mammon
or substance, what was their own property, and not what was stolen from anotherF4Vid.
T. Bab. Succah, fol. 30. 1. & not. Abendana in Miclol Yophi in loc. , see Isaiah 61:8,
bring an offering unto the Lord; called
"Korban" of "Karab", to draw nigh, because it was not only
brought nigh to God, to the door of the tabernacle where he dwelt, but because
by it they drew nigh to God, and presented themselves to him, and that for
them; typical of believers under the Gospel dispensation drawing nigh to God
through Christ, by whom their spiritual sacrifices are presented and accepted
in virtue of his:
ye shall bring your offering of the cattle, even of the
herd, and of the flock; that is, of oxen, and of sheep or goats. The Targum of Jonathan
is,"of a clean beast, of oxen, and of sheep, but not of wild beasts shall
ye bring your offerings.'These were appointed, Ben Gersom says, for these two
reasons, partly because the most excellent, and partly because most easy to be
found and come at, as wild creatures are not: but the true reason is, because
they were very fit to represent the great sacrifice Christ, which all
sacrifices were typical of; the ox or bullock was a proper emblem of him for
his strength and laboriousness, and the sheep for his harmlessness, innocence,
and patience, and the goat, as he was not in himself, but as he was thought to
be, a sinner, being sent in the likeness of sinful flesh, and being traduced as
such, and having the sins of his people imputed to him.
Leviticus 1:3. 3 ‘If
his offering is a burnt sacrifice of the herd, let him offer a male
without blemish; he shall offer it of his own free will at the door of the
tabernacle of meeting before the Lord.
YLT 3`If his offering [is] a burnt-offering out of
the herd -- a male, a perfect one, he doth bring near, unto the opening of the
tent of meeting he doth bring it near, at his pleasure, before Jehovah;
If his offering be a burnt sacrifice of the herd,.... So
called, because consumed by fire, see Leviticus 6:9 even
all of it except the skin, and therefore its name with the Greeks is "a
whole burnt offering", as in Mark 12:33 its name
in Hebrew is עולה, which comes from a word which
signifies to "ascend" or "go up", because not only it was
carried up to the altar by the priest, which was common to other sacrifices,
but being burnt upon it, it ascended upwards in smoke and vapour; it was
typical of Christ's dolorous sufferings and death, who therein sustained the
fire of divine wrath, and his strength was dried up like a potsherd with it.
Jarchi on Leviticus 1:1 says,
there were in the burnt offerings mysteries of future things:
let him offer a male; and not a female,
pointing at the Messiah's sex, and his strength and excellency, the child that
was to be born, and the Son to be given, whose name should be Immanuel:
without blemish; or perfect, having no part wanting,
nor any part superfluous, nor any spot upon it, see Leviticus 22:19
denoting the perfection of Christ as man, being in all things made like unto
his brethren, and his having not the least stain or blemish of sin upon him,
either original or actual, and so could, as he did, offer up himself without
spot to God, Hebrews 2:17,
and he shall offer it of his own voluntary will; not forced or
compelled to it, or with any reluctancy, but as a pure freewill offering; so
our Lord Jesus Christ laid down his life of himself, and freely gave himself an
offering and a sacrifice, and became cheerfully and readily obedient unto
death:
at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, before the Lord; it was to be
done openly and publicly, and in the presence of the Lord, to whom it was
offered up; showing, that Christ's sacrifice would be offered up to God,
against whom we have sinned, by which his law would be fulfilled, his justice
satisfied, and wrath appeased, and that his death would be public and
notorious; see Luke 24:18.
Leviticus 1:4. 4 Then
he shall put his hand on the head of the burnt offering, and it will be
accepted on his behalf to make atonement for him.
YLT 4and he hath laid his hand on the head of the
burnt-offering, and it hath been accepted for him to make atonement for him;
And he shall put his hand on the head of the burnt offering,.... According
to the Targum of Jonathan, it was his right hand; but it is generally thought
by the Jewish writers that both hands were laid on; so Ben Gersom and Aben
Ezra, with whom MaimonidesF5Hilchot Maaseh Hakorbanot, c. 3. sect.
13. agrees, who says, he that lays on hands ought to lay on with all his
strength, with both his hands upon the head of the beast, as it is said,
"upon the head of the burnt offering": not upon the neck, nor upon
the sides; and there should be nothing between his hands and the beast: and as
the same writer saysF6Hilchot Maaseh Hakorbanot, c. 3. sect. 8. Vid.
T. Bab. Menachot, fol. 93. 2. , it must be his own hand, and not the hand of
his wife, nor the hand of his servant, nor his messenger; and who also observesF7Ib.
sect. 14. , that at the same time he made confession over the burnt offering
both of his sins committed against affirmative and negative precepts: and
indeed by this action he owned that he had sinned, and deserved to die as that
creature he brought was about to do, and that he expected pardon of his sin
through the death of the great sacrifice that was a type of. Moreover, this
action signified the transferring of his sins from himself to this sacrifice,
which was to be offered up to make atonement for them; so Gersom observes; see Leviticus 16:21.
This denotes the translation of our sins from us, and the imputation of them to
Christ, who was offered up in our room and stead, to make atonement for them,
as follows:
and it shall be accepted for him to make atonement for him: that is, the
burnt offering should be accepted in his room and stead, and hereby an
atonement of his sins should be made for him, typical of that true, real, and
full atonement made by the sacrifice of Christ, which this led his faith unto.
Leviticus 1:5. 5 He
shall kill the bull before the Lord; and the priests, Aaron’s
sons, shall bring the blood and sprinkle the blood all around on the altar that
is by the door of the tabernacle of meeting.
YLT 5and he hath slaughtered the son of the herd
before Jehovah; and sons of Aaron, the priests, have brought the blood near,
and sprinkled the blood on the altar round about, which [is] at the opening of
the tent of meeting.
And he shall kill the bullock before the Lord,.... That is,
the man that brings the burnt offering, for no other is yet spoken of; and
according to the traditions of the eldersF8Misn. Zebachim, c. 3.
sect. 1. & Maimon. in ib. T. Bab. Yoma, fol. 27. 1. & Zebachim, fol.
32. 1. & Menachot, fol. 19. 1. , killing of the sacrifice was right when
done by strangers, by women, and by servants, and by unclean persons, even in
the most holy things so be it that the unclean did not touch the flesh; and it
is observedF9Bartenora in Misn. Zebachim, ib. , that the service of
the priest begins in the next clause, killing being lawful by him that was not
a priest, according to the Targum of Jonathan, the butcher; but Aben Ezra
interprets it of the priests, and certain it is, that the burnt offerings of
the fowls were killed by the priests, Leviticus 1:15 and
the Septuagint version renders it, "and they shall kill": but be this
as it will, the burnt offering was to be killed in the court before the Lord;
and this was typical of the death of Christ, who, according to these types, as
well as to other prophecies, was to die for the sins of men, and accordingly
did; and if this was the proprietor and not the priest that killed the
sacrifice, it may denote that the sins of God's people, for whom Christ's
sacrifice was offered up, were the cause of his death:
and the priests, Aaron's sons, shall bring the blood: in vessels or
basins, as the Targum of Jonathan adds, into which they received it when slain:
and sprinkle the blood round about upon the altar that is by the
door of the tabernacle of the congregation; which was the altar of
burnt offering, and not the altar of incense, as appears by the situation of
it, see Exodus 40:5 and the
blood was sprinkled all around the altar with two sprinklings: the rule in the
Misnah isF11Misn. Zebachim, c. 5. sect. 4. ; the slaying of the
burnt offering is in the north, and the reception of its blood into the
ministering vessels is in the north, and its blood ought to have two
sprinklings, which answer to four; which MaimonidesF12Perush in ib.
explains thus; because it is said "round about", it must needs be
that the sprinklings should comprehend the four sides of the altar; and this is
done when the two sprinklings are upon the two horns, which are diametrically
opposite; and this is what is meant, "which are four"; the sense is,
that those two should include the four sides, and the two opposite horns were
the northeast and the southwest, as he and other Jewish writers observeF13Jarchi,
Bartenora, & Yom Tob, in ib. , and which he expresses more clearly
elsewhereF14Hilchot Korbanot, c. 5. sect. 6. : when the priest took
the blood in the basin, he sprinkled out of it in the basin, two sprinklings
upon the two corners of the altar opposite from it; and he ordered it so to
sprinkle the blood upon the horn, that the blood might surround the corners in
the form of the Greek letter "gamma"F15Vid. T. Bab.
Zebachim, fol. 53. 2. ; so that the blood of the two sprinklings might be found
upon the four sides of the altar; because it is said of the burnt offerings,
and of the peace offerings "round about"; and this is the law for the
trespass offering, and the rest of the blood was poured out at the bottom
southward: now this was always done by a priest, for though the bullock might
be killed by a stranger, as Gersom on the place observes, yet its blood must be
sprinkled by a priest; and it is the note of Aben Ezra, that this might be done
by many, and therefore it is said, the "priests, Aaron's sons", when
the slaying of it was only by one. The "altar" on which the blood was
sprinkled typified the divinity of Christ, which gave virtue to his blood,
whereby it made atonement for sin; and in allusion to this rite Christ's blood
is called "the blood of sprinkling", 1 Peter 1:2 Hebrews 12:24 which
being sprinkled on the heart by the Spirit of God clears it from an evil
conscience, and purges the conscience from dead works, and speaks peace and
pardon there, Hebrews 10:22.
Leviticus 1:6. 6 And
he shall skin the burnt offering and cut it into its pieces.
YLT 6`And he hath stripped the burnt-offering, and
hath cut it into its pieces;
And he shall flay the burnt offering,.... Take off
its skin; this was the only part of it that was not burnt, and was the property
of the priest, Leviticus 7:8 but
who this was done by is not so manifest, since it is in the singular number
"he", and seems to be the bringer of the offering; for Aaron's sons,
the priests that sprinkled the blood, are spoken of plurally; and agreeably,
Gersom observes, that the flaying of the burnt offering and cutting it in
pieces were lawful to be done by a stranger; but Aben Ezra interprets
"he" of the priest; and the Septuagint and Samaritan versions read in
the plural number, "they shall flay", &c. and this was the work
of the priests, and who were sometimes helped in it by their brethren, the
Levites, 2 Chronicles 29:34
and as this follows upon the sprinkling of the blood, it was never done till
that was; the rule is, they do not flay them (the sacrifices) until the blood
is sprinkled, except the sin offerings, which are burnt, for they do not flay
them at allF16Hilchot Korbanot, c. 5. sect. 18. . The flaying of the
burnt offering may denote the very great sufferings of Christ, when he was
stripped of his clothes, and his back was given to the smiters, and his cheeks
to them that plucked off the hair; and the skin of the sacrifice, which
belonged to the priest, may be an emblem of the righteousness of Christ, and
which also was signified by the coats of skins the Lord God made for Adam and
Eve, Genesis 3:21 that
robe of righteousness, and garments of salvation, which all that are made kings
and priests to God are clothed with:
and cut it into his pieces; which was done while he
was flaying it, and after this manner, as Maimonides relatesF17Ib.
c. 6. sect. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. Vid. Misnah Tamid, c. 4. sect. 2, 3. , he flays
until he comes to the breast, and then he cuts off the head, then its legs, and
finishes the flaying; then he rends the heart, and brings out its blood; then
he cuts off the hands, and goes to the right foot, and cuts off that, and after
that he cuts down the beast until its bowels are discovered; he takes the knife
and separates the lights from the liver, and the caul of the liver from the
liver, and does not remove the liver out of its place; and he goes up to the
right side, and cuts and descends to the backbone, and he does not go to the
backbone until he comes to the two tender ribs; he comes to the neck, and
leaves in it two ribs here and two ribs there; he cuts it and comes to the left
side, and leaves in it two tender ribs above and two tender ribs below; then he
comes to the point of the backbone, he cuts it, and gives it and the tail, and
the caul of the liver, and the two kidneys with it; he takes the left foot and
gives it to another; and according to this order they flay and cut in pieces
the burnt offering of the cattle; and these are the pieces spoken of in the
law, Leviticus 1:6 some
apply this to the ministers of the Gospel, rightly dividing the word of God,
and to the effect the word has in dividing asunder soul and spirit; but it is
best to apply it to Christ, either to the evidence given of him in the Gospel,
in which he is clearly set forth in his person, natures, and offices, and in
all the parts and branches thereof; where every thing is naked and open to
view, as the creature was when thus cut up; or rather to his sufferings, which
he endured in every part of his body, from head to foot.
Leviticus 1:7. 7 The
sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire on the altar, and lay the wood in order
on the fire.
YLT 7and the sons of Aaron the priest have put
fire on the altar, and arranged wood on the fire;
And the sons of Aaron the priest shall put fire upon the altar,.... The fire
of the altar originally came down from heaven, and consumed the sacrifice, and
which was a token of God's acceptance of it, see Leviticus 9:24 and
this fire was kept burning continually upon the altar, Leviticus 6:12 and
yet the Jewish writers say, it was the command of God, according to this
passage, that fire should be brought from another place and put here; Jarchi's
note on the text is,"though fire came down from heaven, it was commanded
to bring it from a common or private place:'and MaimonidesF18Hilchot.
Tamidin, c. 2. sect. 1. says the same thing, and so it is often said in the
TalmudF19T. Bab. Erubin, fol. 63. 1. Yoma, fol. 21. 2. & 53. 1.
; and this, as Gersom observes, was not done by any but a priest in the time of
his priesthood, or when clothed with his priestly garments; and so in the
Talmud it is said, that the putting fire upon the altar belonged to the
priesthood, but not flaying or cutting in piecesF20T. Bab. Yoma,
fol. 26. 2. Vid. T. Bab. Zebachim, fol. 18. 1. : this fire denoted the wrath of
God, revealed from heaven against all unrighteousness and ungodliness of men,
and which is the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels, and
all the workers of iniquity; and which Christ endured for his people in human
nature, when he bore their sins, and became a whole burnt offering for them:
and lay the wood in order upon the fire; the wood for
the sacrifice was an offering of the people, brought to the temple at the times
appointed, Nehemiah 10:34
where was a place called לשכת העצים,
"the wood room", or "wood chamber", and which was in the
northeast part of the court of the women; and here such priests as had
blemishes wormed the wood, or searched the wood for worms; for whatsoever wood
had a worm found in it, it was not fit to be laid upon the altar; and it was
from hence the priests fetched the wood and laid it on the altarF21Misn.
Middot, c. 2. sect. 5. ; for a private person might not bring it from his own
house for his offeringF23Issure Mizbeach, c. 5. sect. 13. T. Bab.
Cholin, fol. 27. 1. , though it was provided by the congregationF24T.
Bab. Menachot, fol. 22. 1. , and brought thither by private persons; and it
might be any sort of wood but that of the vine and oliveF25Misn.
Tamid, c. 2. sect. 3. & T. Bab. Tamid, fol. 29. 2. , which were not used,
because they did not burn well, and were soon reduced to ashes; and because
such a consumption would be made of such useful trees hereby, that there would
be no wine or oil in the land of Israel, so necessary for private and religious
uses. The Vulgate Latin version renders it, "the pile of wood being laid
before": that is, before the fire was put upon the altar; but this is
contrary to the text, for the wood was laid upon the fire, and therefore the
fire must be first; the case seems to be this, the fire was first kindled, and
then the wood laid in order upon it.
Leviticus 1:8. 8 Then
the priests, Aaron’s sons, shall lay the parts, the head, and the fat in order
on the wood that is on the fire upon the altar;
YLT 8and sons of Aaron, the priests, have arranged
the pieces, with the head and the fat, on the wood, which [is] on the fire,
which [is] on the altar;
And the priests, Aaron's sons, shall lay the parts,.... That were
cut in pieces, Leviticus 1:6 some
of which are particularly mentioned:
the head and the fat; the head which was cut
off, and the body, the trunk of it; so, Aben Ezra says, the wise men interpret
the word פדר "fat", which is only used here
and in Leviticus 1:12 and
which he thinks is right; though others take it to be the fat caul, or midriff,
which parts the entrails; and the Targum of Jonathan renders it, the covering
of fat: these are particularly mentioned, but include in general the rest of
the pieces, which were laid:
in order upon the wood that is on the fire which is upon the altar; this
disposition of the several parts of the burnt offering upon the altar signifies
the laying of Christ upon the cross, and the disposition of his head, his
hands, and feet there; according to the usual order of crucifixion: the skin,
as before observed, was not burnt, but was the property of the priest, and the
sinew that shrunk was taken away, and cast upon the ashes in the middle of the
altarF26Ib. Maaseh Hakorbanot, c. 6. sect. 4. .
Leviticus 1:9. 9 but
he shall wash its entrails and its legs with water. And the priest shall burn
all on the altar as a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, a sweet aroma
to the Lord.
YLT 9and its inwards and its legs he doth wash
with water; and the priest hath made perfume with the whole on the altar, a
burnt-offering, a fire-offering of sweet fragrance to Jehovah.
But the inwards and his legs shall he wash in water,.... This was
first done in a room in the court of the temple, called לשכת
המדחין, "the room of the washers", or the
washing room, where they washed the inwards of the holy thingsF1Misn.
Middot, c. 5. sect. 2. Maimon Beth Habechirah, c. 5. sect. 17. ; and after that
they washed them upon the marble tables between the pillars, where they washed
them three times at leastF2Ib. c. 3. sect. 5. & Tamid, c. 4.
sect. 2. Piske, Tosaphot Middot, Art. 23. ; and whereas this is said to be done
"in water"; MaimonidesF3Hilchot Hakorbanot, c. 6. sect. 6.
Vid. T. Bab. Zebachim, fol. 22. 1. observes,"not in wine, nor in a mixture
of wine and water, nor in other liquids:'the washing of the inwards and legs
denoted the internal purity of Christ's heart, and the external holiness of his
life and conversation, and the saints' purification by him both in heart and
life: with Philo the JewF4De Victimis, p. 839. these things had a
mystical meaning; by the washing of the inwards was signified that lusts were
to be washed away, and such spots removed as were contracted by surfeiting and
drunkenness, very harmful to the lives of men; and by the washing of the feet
was signified that we should no more walk upon the earth, but mount up to the
air, and pass through that, even to heaven:
and the priest shall burn all on the altar; all the other
pieces, as well as the inwards and legs, excepting the skin, which denoted the
painful sufferings of Christ, and the extent of them to all parts of his body;
and indeed his soul felt the fire of divine wrath, and became an offering for
sin:
to be a burnt
sacrifice, an offering made by fire; that is, all the parts
of the bullock were burnt on the altar, that it might appear to be a whole
burnt offering consumed by fire:
of a sweet savour unto the Lord: he accepting of it, and
smelling a sweet savour of rest in it, as an atonement for sin, typical of the
sacrifice of Christ, which is to God for a sweet smelling savour, Ephesians 5:2 the
Jewish doctorsF5Misn. Menachot, c. 13. sect. 11. T. Bab. Shebuot,
fol. 15. 1. gather from hence, that whether a man offers much or little, it
matters not, if his heart is but directed to God; which Maimonides explains
thusF6In Misn. ib. , he that studies in the law, it is all one as if
he offered a burnt offering, or a meat offering, or a sin offering, concerning
which this phrase is used.
Leviticus 1:10. 10 ‘If
his offering is of the flocks—of the sheep or of the goats—as a burnt
sacrifice, he shall bring a male without blemish.
YLT 10`And if his offering [is] out of the flock --
out of the sheep or out of the goats -- for a burnt-offering, a male, a perfect
one, he doth bring near,
And if his offering be of the flocks,.... As it
might be:
namely, of the sheep,
or of the goats for a burnt sacrifice; which were both typical
of Christ; see Gill on Leviticus 1:2.
he shall bring it a male without blemish; See Gill on Leviticus 1:3.
Leviticus 1:11. 11 He shall kill it on the
north side of the altar before the Lord; and the priests, Aaron’s
sons, shall sprinkle its blood all around on the altar.
YLT 11and he hath slaughtered it by the side of the
altar northward, before Jehovah; and sons of Aaron, the priests, have sprinkled
its blood on the altar round about;
And he shall kill it on the side of the altar northward before the
Lord,.... This is a circumstance not mentioned in the killing of the
bullock: MaimonidesF7In Misn. Zebachim, c. 5. sect. 1. says, there
was a square place from the wall of the altar northward, to the wall of the
court, and it was sixty cubits, and all that was over against the breadth of
this, from the wall of the porch to the eastern wall, and it is seventy six
cubits; and this foursquare place is called the "north", for the
slaying of the most holy things; so that it seems this being a large place, was
fittest for this purpose. Aben Ezra intimates, as if some respect was had to
the situation of Mount Zion; his note is, "on the side of the altar
northward", i.e. without, and so "the sides of the north", Psalm 48:2 for so
many mistake who say that the tower of Zion was in the midst of Jerusalem; and
with this agrees Mr. Ainsworth's note on Leviticus 6:25
hereby was figured, that Christ our sin offering should be killed by the
priests in Jerusalem, and Mount Sion, which was on "the sides of the
north", Psalm 48:2
crucified on Mount Calvary, which was on the northwest side of Jerusalem; as by
the Jews' tradition, the morning sacrifice was killed at the northwest horn of
the altarF8Misn. Tamid, c. 4. sect. 1. :
and the priests, Aaron's sons, shall sprinkle the blood round
about upon the altar; See Gill on Leviticus 1:5.
Leviticus 1:12. 12 And
he shall cut it into its pieces, with its head and its fat; and the priest
shall lay them in order on the wood that is on the fire upon the altar;
YLT 12and he hath cut it into its pieces, and its
head and its fat, and the priest hath arranged them on the wood, which [is] on
the fire, which [is] on the altar;
And he shall cut it into his pieces, with his head and his fat,.... Or
"his body", as the Targum of Jonathan; this was to be cut in pieces
in the same manner as the bullock; see Gill on Leviticus 1:6,
and the priest shall lay them in order on the wood that is
on the fire, which is on the altar; See Gill on Leviticus 1:8.
Leviticus 1:13. 13 but
he shall wash the entrails and the legs with water. Then the priest shall bring
it all and burn it on the altar; it is a burnt sacrifice,
an offering made by fire, a sweet aroma to the Lord.
YLT 13and the inwards and the legs he doth wash
with water, and the priest hath brought the whole near, and hath made perfume
on the altar; it [is] a burnt-offering, a fire-offering of sweet fragrance to
Jehovah.
But he shall wash the inwards and the legs with water,.... As he did
the bullock, Leviticus 1:9,
and the priest shall bring it all: all the parts
to the ascent of the altar, as the JewsF9T. Bab. Pesachim, fol. 65.
2. & Yoma, fol. 27. 1. Chagigah, fol. 11. 1. interpret it; all the parts
and pieces of it, even the very wool on the sheep's head, and the hair on the
goat's beard, their bones, sinews, and horns, and hoofsF11Misn.
Zebachim, c. 9. sect. 5. Maimon. Hilchot Hakorbanot, c. 6. sect. 2. , all were
burnt, as it follows:
and burn it on the altar, it is a burnt offering, an
offering made by fire, of a sweet savour unto the Lord; See Gill on Leviticus 1:9.
Leviticus 1:14. 14 ‘And
if the burnt sacrifice of his offering to the Lord is of
birds, then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves or young pigeons.
YLT 14`And if his offering [is] a burnt-offering
out of the fowl to Jehovah, than he hath brought near his offering out of the turtle-doves
or out of the young pigeons,
And if the burnt sacrifice for his offering to the Lord be of
fowls,.... As it might be for the poorer sort, who could not offer a
bullock, nor a sheep, or a lamb, Leviticus 5:7,
then he shall bring his offering of turtledoves, or of young
pigeons; the Jewish writers all agree, that the turtles should be old,
and not young, as the pigeons young, and not old; so the Targum of Jonathan,
Jarchi, Aben Ezra and GersomF12Vid. T. Bab. Cholin, fol. 22. 1, 2. ;
the latter gives two reasons for it, because then they are the choicest and
easiest to be found and taken: no mention is made of their being male or
female, either would do, or of their being perfect and unblemished, as in the
other burnt offerings; but if any part was wanting, it was not fit for
sacrifice, as MaimonidesF13Issure Mizbeach, c. 3. sect. 1, 2. Vid.
Misn. Zebachim, c. 7. sect. 5. & Maimon. & Bartenora, in ib. observes.
These creatures were proper emblems of Christ, and therefore used in sacrifice,
whose voice is compared to the turtle's, and his eyes to the eyes of doves, Song of Solomon 2:12
and who is fitly represented by them for his meekness and humility, for his
chaste and strong affection to his church, as the turtledove to its mate, and
for those dove like graces of the Spirit which are in him.
Leviticus 1:15. 15 The
priest shall bring it to the altar, wring off its head, and burn it on
the altar; its blood shall be drained out at the side of the altar.
YLT 15and the priest hath brought it near unto the
altar, and hath wrung off its head, and hath made perfume on the altar, and its
blood hath been wrung out by the side of the altar;
And the priest shall bring it unto the altar,.... The
southeast horn of it; near which was the place of the ashes, into which the
crop and its feathers were castF14Misn. Zebachim, c. 6. sect. 5.
& Bartenora in ib. :
and wring off his head; by twisting it back as
it should seem; the word used is only to be found here, and in Leviticus 5:8 the
Jews say, it signifies to cut with the nail, and that the priest did this, not
with a knife or any other instrument, but with his nail; so Jarchi and Gersom
on the place observe: some think he only let out the blood this way, but did
not separate the head from the body, which seems to be favoured by Leviticus 5:8
though Maimonides and BartenoraF15In Misn. ib. conclude the reverse
from the same place; and that the meaning is, that he should cut off the head
and divide it asunder at the time he cuts with the nail: the manner of cutting
with the nail was thisF16Maimon. in Misn. ib. sect. 4. &
Bartenora. in ib. , the priest held both the feet of the bird with his two
fingers of his left hand, and the wings between two other fingers, and the bird
upon the back of his hand, that it might not be within the palm of it; then he
stretches out its neck upon the thumb about two fingers' breadth, and cuts it
over against the neck with his nail, and this is one of the hardest services in
the sanctuary:
and burn it on the altar; that is, the head, after
squeezing out the blood, and rubbing it with salt:
and the blood thereof shall be wrung out at the side of the altar: or "the
wall" of it: this, though mentioned last, must be done before, and
immediately upon the wringing of the head, and between that and the burning it
on the altar: this wringing off the head, and wringing out the blood, denote
violence, and show that Christ's death, which this was a type of, was a violent
one; the Jews laid violent hands upon him, and pursued his life in a violent
manner, were very pressing to have it taken away, and his life was taken away
in such a manner by men, though not without his Father's secret will, and his
own consent.
Leviticus 1:16. 16 And
he shall remove its crop with its feathers and cast it beside the altar on the
east side, into the place for ashes.
YLT 16and he hath turned aside its crop with its
feathers, and hath cast it near the altar, eastward, unto the place of ashes;
And he shall pluck away his crop with his feathers,.... Or
"with its meat", or "dung", as Onkelos renders it, meaning
that which was in its crop; and so the Jerusalem Targum interprets it,
"with its dung"; and Jonathan's paraphrase is, "with its collection",
or what was gathered together in the crop; it includes the entrails, as Gersom
observes:
and cast it beside the altar on the east part, by the place of the
ashes; where the ashes of the burnt offering were put every day, and
every time such an offering was made; and all this answered to the washing of
the inwards, and legs of the other burnt offerings, and signified the same
thing, the cleanness and purity of Christ, and of his people by him.
Leviticus 1:17. 17 Then
he shall split it at its wings, but shall not divide it
completely; and the priest shall burn it on the altar, on the wood that is
on the fire. It is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, a sweet
aroma to the Lord.
YLT 17and he hath cleaved it with its wings (he
doth not separate [it]), and the priest hath made it a perfume on the altar, on
the wood, which [is] on the fire; it [is] a burnt-offering, a fire-offering of
sweet fragrance to Jehovah.
And he shall cleave it with the wings thereof,.... One wing
being on one side, and the other on the other side:
but shall not divide it asunder; the body of the bird,
though it was cleaved down in the middle, yet not parted asunder, nor any of
its wings separated from it; the Targum of Jonathan paraphrases it, "but
shall not separate its wings from it"; this denoted, that though, by the
death of Christ, his soul and body were separated from each other, yet the
human nature was not separated from his divine Person, the personal union
between the two natures still continuing; nor was he divided from his divine
Father, though he was forsaken by him, yet still in union with him as the Son
of God; nor from the divine Spirit, by which he offered up himself to God, and
by which he was quickened; nor from his church and people, for whom he
suffered, they being united to him as members to their head:
and the priest shall burn it upon the altar, upon the wood that is
upon the fire; in like manner as the ox, sheep, or goat were burnt: according
to the Misnah, the priest went up the ascent (of the altar) and turned round
about the circuit; when he came to the southeast horn, he cut its head (or
nipped it) with his nail, over against its neck, and divided it, and squeezed
out its blood by the wall of the altar, and turned the part nipped to the
altar, and struck it at it, and rubbed it with salt, and cast it upon the
fires; then he went to the body and removed the crop and its feathers (or dung)
and the entrails that came out along with it, and threw them into the place of
ashes; he cleaved but did not divide asunder, but if he divided it was right,
then he rubbed it with salt, and cast it upon the firesF17Misn.
Zebachim, c. 6. sect. 5. :
it is a burnt sacrifice, an offering made by fire, of a sweet
savour unto the Lord; See Gill on Leviticus 1:9 so
with the Heathens, to the gods of the air they sacrificed fowls for burnt
offeringsF18Porphyr. apud Euseb. Praepar. Evangel. l. 4. c. 9. p.
146. Vid. Maoreb. Saturnal. l. 3. c. 8. .
──《John Gill’s
Exposition of the Bible》